When
bowling a player may find his ball is drifting to one side or the other, often
missing the headpin. Logic might incline
the bowler to compensate; if I’m rolling
far left, I need to move my body to the right. However, professionals will
argue that the player should move their stance toward the drift to adjust and correct. Being counterintuitive will more likely brings
success.
I
somehow doubt Hillary Clinton bowls. However, I suspect that if she did her advisors
might be telling her to move in the opposite
direction of her previous bad deliveries. That seems to be her response to
Bernie Sanders’ populous appeal. If
highlighting her differences with Bernie isn’t working then double down
twice as hard.
As
the presumptive favorite, Hillary’s has routinely been missing the headpin with
each challenge she has faced in her attempts to generate enthusiasm for her
quest to secure the Democratic presidential nomination. Such failures may be given short shrift by her
campaign due to continued confidence that when all the votes (primarily
delegate votes) are counted she’ll prevailed.
The
real danger is that her actions in this primary may adversely affect the
outcome of the general election. At the
very least they might cripple her Presidency by crippling the success of
Democrats in Senate, House, Governor, and state legislature contests.
The
first and major misdirection has been her failure to understand the Bernie
Sanders phenomenon.
This
was beautifully illustrated by one of the last questions asked of her in the
February 4th debate on MSNBC.
She was asked if she would consider Bernie as her running mate should
she get the nomination. Her response was
dismissive, again moving away. She
should have said: absolutely, I would
place him near the top of any list of candidates I might consider. He is
insightful, consistent with my values, and I hope he would remain one of my
closest advisors. It would also need to be (and should be) the truth, or
close to it.
Because
of her trivializing response, she may, regretfully, not be asked this question
again…a lost opportunity.
My
son, a two tour Iraqi veteran, now a student, who has been for years particularly
non-political, recently posted on Facebook
that he had displayed his first bumper sticker ever: Feel the Bern. It is simply a current reality that Bernie’s
supporters love him, and for some very good reasons.
Sanders
has elevated a message of empowerment to a National level. He has become, for
this election cycle, the rational counter-balance to the power brokers who use
the Republican Party to control the less educated, irrational, or just plain
stupid electorate with fear mongering. He has done it with the rhetoric so many
hoped would come out of Obama’s mouth, but never did.
More
than that, to younger and relatively educated voters, men and women, Bernie represents the antithesis of the curmudgeon
grandfather who watches Fox News and says that anything governmental (other
than the military) is bullshit. Saunders is more like the Grandfather who
works as a college professor and throughout his life has been consistent,
perceptive, independent, and admired. He’s the one they not only look forward
to eating Thanksgiving dinner with, but also the one they want to spend time
with after the meal.
Could
Sanders win the Presidency? Not likely against a moderate Republican who could,
with half a billion dollars, turn him into a doddering old Communist in the
pivotal states of Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Florida (where
the entire election will be decided). Perhaps he could win against the lunacy
of a Donald Trump, but even with Trump, Bernie might be just one terrorist
attack away from handing the keys to the asylum over to the insane.
So
how have Hillary and Bill Clinton responded to this heady yet emotional
following for Sanders? They have decided
to use the old line political hack jobs that have been the political modus
operandi for generations: attack the man. This is Hillary moving away from the
strike zone and I would guess that she, her husband and advisors are currently
trying to come up with anything they can to undermine Sanders’ candidacy, which
will move her even further off the mark.
Hillary
needs to legitimately become part of the Bernie Revolution, but add the
construction that Sanders leaves out. For
example; instead of attacking him for suggesting a universal single-payer
health care system, agree with him that a single payer system may in fact be
the final step on the journey begun by Obamacare. She is the one to continue
that journey by reintroducing the Public Option that the medical insurance
industry (via the Republican Party) kept out of the Affordable Health Care Act.
With
her considerable wins on Super Tuesday Clinton may calm her rhetoric (if she
would just stop shouting it would help).
It is to her advantage if Sanders stays in the race, but only if she
begins to feel the bern herself. For
Hillary to be an effective president she needs to do more than just win. She needs to bring out an electorate which
will put her in office, but also make changes down the ticket and force an
evolution in the Republican Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment