As
a small child growing up in the 1950s I loved war. The romanticizing of military
conflict had exploded after WWII. I was particularly fond of the American
Revolution and the Civil War, what little I knew. When I played Civil War,
often by myself with make-believe solders, I usually favored the Rebels,
despite growing up an hour north of New York City. After all, they were the scrappy
underdogs. I didn’t have the slightest concept of what slavery was or had been.
My
love of history taught me much more over the decades with a clearer
understanding of the conflict we know as the Civil War, but often referred to by Southerners as The War Between the States. The
difference in title is telling. Civil War implies a conflict between citizens
of the same country while the other is more simply geographic affiliation, e.g.
Nationalism
When
I moved to Richmond, Virginia in 1981 as an educated, employed, white male I
recall being impressed with the displayed (almost) reverence to the Civil War
and the allegiances that had supported the Southern cause. After all, north of
Gettysburg the Civil War has a fairly small footprint across village greens. It
was like going back in time.
I
was also keenly aware of the results of discrimination in the South, resulting
in the socio-economic deficits experienced by African-Americans. However, it
was relatively easy – way too easy – not to associate the plight of poor, less
educated Blacks with the conflict that had ended 160 years earlier and its foundational discrimination.
As
the years past and we experience life in the South, my wife and I slowly at
first and then almost constantly reacted to a societal reality. As “Yankees” we
were able to objectively observe how those native to the region had embraced
their heritage like a religion. Unfortunately, from our perspective, that “religion”
included underlying hostilities, fears, and insecurities. Casting African-Americans as a single lot (the essence
of racism), viewing Northerners as foreigners, extolling Nationalism but with
Confederate Flags were all too obvious.
Gun
ownership clearly had long expanded beyond practical use and become symbolic of
defiance to anything that wasn’t consistent with the Dukes of Hazard.
With
a growing family, we found ourselves loving the area, the congenial nature and
honesty of Virginians, economic opportunity, and friendship warmly afforded to a
young family. Still, when we’d see what was happening around us, the “stars and
bars” snapping in the wind everywhere, war reenactments, and what was on the
news daily, we’d often say to each other, “when in the hell is this damned
Civil War going to end?”
That
day may have arrived. Let’s hope so.
The
BLM demonstrations have been supported by a wide spectrum of individuals and organizations.
As part of it they have shined a stark light on the affection given to a
conflict where the origins and motivations have been so removed as to allow
those that extolled the conflict to act like small boys playing with
make-believe soldiers. Despite any historical reference, the removal of
tributes to the Conflict (statues, flags etc) is not only appropriate, but also
carries the weight of morality.
Let
the Civil War surrender itself to former battlefields and cemeteries. However, I find
myself conflicted with the apparent attempt to erase slavery as an historical
reality, most recently in the attacking of a rash of monuments that have no
representation to the Confederacy, but some connection to slavery (Washington,
Jefferson, Keyes, Grant etc.). I’m afraid in doing so they are missing the
point and playing into the hands of White Supremacists.
We
live in an enlightened world. The immorality of slavery is no more in question,
regardless that it was morally acceptable as an institution for 95% of recorded
history. Embedded pseudo-slavery, as with indentured servitude, imprisoned individuals,
and women generally has existed even longer, and we also know it’s wrong,
though in many areas of the world it still survives.
The
real crime to consider for Black Americans and ethnic minorities generally is
not slavery, it’s what happened after
slavery ended: the subjugation of an
entire population based on race to keep them as a viable economic resource
while simultaneously denying them access to the opportunities of a free
society, social and economic. This was true in two essential and critical
aspects: education and real property ownership and it was done through legal
policy that let discrimination flourish.
The
BLM movement needs to pivot from the emotional backlash against history to supporting
policies that fundamentally compliment the new understanding of morality we’re
experiencing today. Get rid of the Trumplicans and place in office people at
all levels of Government that understand how to get policy done. Protest those that are trying to suppress the
vote, and then get out and vote the right people in. It is the issue that transcends
race or ethnicity.
No comments:
Post a Comment