“Satan is a liberal, anything goes, no
rules, no
laws, no borders, no evil, murder is
encouraged,
law and order is condemned, can you believe
any sane human would be a liberal??? NO
WAY.”
Jack (I won't give his last name) shared these comments on Facebook reacting to the posting of a generic statement from nolabels.org
on the need for National unity. It called for ending “political polarization”
and “breaking the gridlock in Congress”…pretty standard stuff in this day in
age.
Jack
fits a stereotype (white male over 60 – his picture is below), but his comments
shouldn’t be dismissed or marginalized by either Conservatives or Liberals
simply because they express an extreme position. If his words were a picture,
we would be wrong to focus solely on the colors.
I
believe if pressed most Conservatives would not defend the notion that Liberals
promote murder, that Liberals advocate the elimination of laws and regulations
(they’re usually attacked for the opposite), that they want the abolishment of
all boarders, or that Satan, a religious construct, has a political
affiliation. Is God really a Conservative?
Yet
even then I think a majority of those politically Conservative would support
Jack. They would because he represents what they feel. He articulates at a primary level the fear they fear. Jack
essentially mirrors their emotions.
How
did this fear and the hatred that has grown from that fear become so pervasive?
Looking back through my generation I can remember that Liberal and Conservative
positions were argued passionately, including their impact on foreign
affairs. However, I cannot recall a time
in the last century when the supporters of an opposing issue were desperately
feared.
Political
party affiliation wasn’t limited by philosophical leanings as it is today. The
socially liberal Republicans prior to the 1990s are now not only publicly extinct;
they are viewed as never existing. That is hard to believe. The joke that says
a Republican Congressman is anti-abortion
until his girlfriend gets pregnant has real teeth.
I
firmly believe the beginning of this divide began specifically in August 1987.
Analysis
after World War II concluded that the totalitarian axis powers (notably
Germany) were able to exist at all because of their control of mass media, a
new 20th century phenomenon. They concluded that unchallenged information
made possible the horrors we can barely grasp today. It answered the question, “how could any nation let this happen?”.
In
1949 the US responded to this reality by having the new FCC enact the Fairness Doctrine , which mandated that
in order to be licensed to broadcast, a station had to provide competing views
on issues of national interest. This doctrine stood in place with practically
no complaint by the public for 38 years (and through 6 Presidents) before
Ronald Reagan succumbed to pressures in his seventh year. He ended it in August
1987 and soon after vetoed Congress’s attempt to make it law. In less than a year, Rush Limbaugh and his
ilk began their non-stop, dogmatic, hate-filled rhetoric…the seeds for making
Jack who he is today.
The
Republicans are a minority party, but they have been finely crafted by the
circumstances that have evolved over the past 30 years. They have become attuned
to the necessities of obtaining and maintaining power. They only needed money
and Rush Limbaugh (figuratively speaking).
They
have fed and been fed by the fears this new era of echo communication has
engendered. In order to maintain power they need to keep their entire Party in
lockstep. They do this by supporting the communication that keeps their
Conservative minority (the famous Trump base) in lockstep, then using that base
to keep individual Republican feet to the flame or face losing elections.
They
need Jack to be afraid and to hate. It is their mother’s milk.
There
are easily discernible reasons why Trump is as he is, even medical ones (take
20 minutes to read about people with the relatively rare condition known as a Narcissistic Personality Disorder, it
explains everything). It is less understandable why intelligent men and women
in Congress cannot see the danger his Office presents to this Nation.
These
Republican leaders in Washington are so compromised by their desire for power
and the wealthy that finance them, they cannot confront the Jacks of the
Nation, no matter how ludicrous and destructive Jack’s fears are.
With
Woodward’s account and the declaration of another Trump official, the
instability of Donald Trump (something painfully obvious since he excoriated
his inauguration coverage by, what we now know as, the “enemy of the people”) has
now been sounded publically. That bell cannot be un-rung. It all depends on Republicans in Congress and,
to a lesser extent, this coming election November 6th to stop the bleeding.
If
3 Republican Senators said they would not vote for Kavanaugh’s confirmation in
favor of a bipartisan panel of Republicans and Democrats to produce a list of
acceptable Conservative nominees (in the style of Anthony Kennedy) that Trump had to accept, it would change the
entire trajectory of Washington governance. It won’t happen. But the irony is
that it would be in the Republican Party’s best interest if it did.
What do you think Jack?
What do you think Jack?
No comments:
Post a Comment