Why is Mitt afraid to release the
returns? It's anybody's guess, but let
me tell you mine. His fears are pretty practical, and it isn't simply the chagrin
he might face from paying low taxes during any particular year.
The US Tax Code is anything but
black and white. If the complexities of
intimate relationships can be 50 shades of gray, the tax code is in triple
digits. The Code itself is thousands of
pages alone, but much of how income and asset transfers are taxed has also been
determined through thousands of court decisions which have created the US Tax
Regulations and tens of thousands of IRS Letter Rulings, all of which are many
times the size of the Tax Code.
The US Tax System is essentially
an honor system. Individuals are required to file with the Federal Government as
tax law requires, but are allowed individual interpretations if the law is
presumed unclear. Their interpretations remain unchanged unless an individual
is audited and the taxpayer must defend their interpretation. That audit must take place within 3 years of
the due date of the filed return.
Barring a grossly unjustified interpretation (which might even be
criminal), after those 3 years the taxpayer is free and clear. If Romney
releases his returns with any time left for the army of Obama tax experts to
review them I feel they would undoubtedly find errors and/or aggressive
interpretations by Romney which would show he effectively (and possibly illegally)
dodged a substantial amount of tax. This is a simple reality for individuals
who have significant income earning assets and the means to employ expert and
aggressive tax attorneys. It would be devastating to the Romney campaign and
possibly a show stopper on the whole contest.
The importance of this disclosure
is not simply the means to torpedo Romney’s chances at the White House. There needs to be a demonstration to the
American people just how extraordinarily vast the distance is between the
wealthy and “middle class”. Romney is a
living metaphor for this problem that reaches much more deeply than a simple “class”
struggle. Nothing demonstrates this more
than the way our tax laws have been weighted.
The absurdity of Romney, Ryan,
and the Republicans to embrace the idea that to increase wealth for the super
rich will increase jobs would be laughable in Econ 101. Published statistics and research by scholars
such as Edward Wolff of NYU show: the top 1% of households own more than 50% of
all assets in America, if you factor out residential housing. The top 20% own nearly 90%!! The bottom 40% own about one-half of 1%. Increasing this concentration will do absolutely
nothing for the economy. Yet, like the
morbidly obese, Republicans don’t want to see that stuffing more money in their
wide mouths only worsens an already dire situation.
The primary origin of this so
called “Great Recession” was the collapse of the housing market, which was
quickly followed by a collapse in commercial real estate. It is also the reason
for it lingering over the past 3 years.
Conversely, the great real estate bubble that extended from the late 90s
to 2007 is what powered the growth in the US economy. Why?
It did so because the driver of economic growth, and therefore
employment, is a great number of people spending money, put simply. To do that a large segment of the population
needs two things; a feeling of financial well being and a reasonable degree of
predictability about their future. Expanded real estate values accomplished both.
To push us in the right direction
the Federal Government should force, if necessary, providers to refinance of home
mortgages to current interest rates regardless of
any other factors, flatten the tax rate of the middle class (not
necessarily reducing taxes), increase top income tax brackets, and increase the
holding period for long-term capital gains from one year to three years and
disallowing long-term losses to offset short term gains (thus increasing
short-term gains to be included as ordinary income). Do you think this could happen with Romney in
the White House? The irony is, of
course, by doing these things we would not only increase spending growth, more
jobs, and improved budgets, but the rich (interesting) would do better
themselves…but expecting Republicans to stop concentrating wealth would be like expecting Homer Simpson to ignore the plate
of doughnuts laying on his belly. By
increasing the size of the pie and have most of that increase go to the middle
class, everyone wins.
So when Harry Reid makes a wild
accusation about Romney’s taxes keeping the issue alive I say hooray for Harry. If it were me I’d be saying Romney earned
income from child sweat shops in Malaysia, donated money to fund Gay Pride Day
in Provincetown, MA, or takes child care credits for his six Mormon wives and eighteeen children in
Utah – anything to keep the pressure on and the issue alive. Forget about Ryan…he’s a jerk.
No comments:
Post a Comment